One source of truth
Decide which record is authoritative before moving data between tools. Conflicting updates need a defined resolution path.
SOORVO / Workflow & Back-Office Automation
SOORVO designs and implements the steps between your business tools: intake, routing, record updates, approvals, reminders and follow-through. We map the work first, including the incomplete inputs and exceptions that need a person.
The work behind the service
A form creates a request. Someone copies it, checks a detail, asks for approval and updates another system. We make those handoffs explicit so the workflow has a clear start, an accountable owner and a finish state.
What we build
The final scope follows your workflow, existing tools and the decisions your team needs to keep.
Choose the system of record, required fields, allowed status changes and rules for duplicates. Define which system owns each important value.
Scope CRM updates, scheduling handoffs, document requests, internal tasks or quote approvals around the actual process and available interfaces.
Identify missing information, ambiguous requests and decisions requiring approval. Give each exception a destination and a recovery action.
Check repeat triggers, interrupted steps and unavailable connections. Confirm that the workflow can distinguish a completed task from one waiting for help.
One workflow, different outcomes
Explore an illustrative request-to-task handoff. Its status should reflect what actually happened in the connected systems.
Illustrative workflow / no live data
An intake arrives with the required information.
Validate the fields and check for an existing record.
Assign the task and carry forward its source and current status in the agreed system.
An intake arrives with the required information.
Validate the fields and check for an existing record.
Create the next work item. Assign the task and carry forward its source and current status in the agreed system.
The request is missing a detail needed for the next step.
Keep it in a waiting state.
Ask for the missing detail. Request only what is needed or route the record to its owner. Do not treat incomplete intake as finished work.
The same request is delivered again.
Check whether this action has already been completed.
Avoid a duplicate action. Use the source identifier and destination state to decide whether to continue, skip or request review.
Where judgment belongs
AI is useful for tasks such as interpreting an unstructured message. A known approval rule or required-field check may be better expressed directly. We choose the mechanism for the task.
Decide which record is authoritative before moving data between tools. Conflicting updates need a defined resolution path.
Price changes, sensitive decisions or irreversible actions may need explicit approval. Those boundaries belong in the workflow from the start.
First-party implementation
The Everline Advisory project used email classification to separate new leads, complex CPA questions, irrelevant messages and ongoing conversations. That is a concrete example of different inputs requiring different operational paths.
See the CPA routing modelScope before a quote
The scope follows workflow complexity, access to the connected tools, exception paths and the tests needed to establish completion. Ongoing changes and vendor usage are separate layers.
See the three-layer pricing modelExact pricing, timing and service coverage follow the agreed scope.
Start with the work
Bring the workflow, the tools and the point where things get stuck.